Informed consent for biomaterial usage in Russian law

Any competition of two persons’ interests can likely to be deemed as collision of some values protected, at the highest level, by a constitution. Although such a conflict is to be balanced by a legislator and anyone who enforce the law, one of rival interests groups is usually stronger thus becoming general rules of the law while competing interests form exceptions which tends to harmonize the whole legislative system.

The content of right of ownership on bodily material in Russia

Recently I made couple of posts on the controversial question whether tissues and cells are property according to current Russian law concluding with affirmative answer.  I'd like to continue developing this idea, diving into the problem of starting point of their existence as well as the content of the owner's right. 

Biological cell products

On the 1^st of January 2017 the new Law On Biological Cell Products took force to regulate procurement and preservation of human bodily material for medical therapy (art. 1). It was specifically mentioned that it did not cover not only blood donation or assisted reproductive technologies, but also circulation of biosamples for research purposes, thus being an analog for the European directives on advanced medical treatment.

Is there a property right on human tissues and cells?

Is there a property right in human tissues and cells after separation from the body? The issue is being hotly debated throughout the Globe and today I'd like to outline few existing norms on the topic according to Russian law. 

In Russian legislation there are no general provisions on biomaterial after separation from a human body, in the Law “On protection of human health” (hereinafter – “the Law On Health Protection”) where they are expected to be located one can find only a mention that laboratory diagnostics is a kind of medical service (art. 2).