Several
days ago the Supreme Court of Russia issues its first quarterly review
of its most important decisions, which had been made recently (Russian text is available on the official web site). The
eighth judgment was about whether a plummeting fall of Russian currency
because of Crimea crisis could be considered as hardship and thus led to
conversion of a loan contract. The Court unsurprisingly gave a negative
answer, confirming general reluctance to use ‘rebus sic stantibus’
doctrine. However some remarks in the ruling seem to leave a door open
to use this clause as a ground for contract modification…