Several
 days ago the Supreme Court of Russia issues its first quarterly review 
of its most important decisions, which had been made recently (Russian text is available on the official web site). The 
eighth judgment was about whether a plummeting fall of Russian currency 
because of Crimea crisis could be considered as hardship and thus led to
 conversion of a loan contract. The Court unsurprisingly gave a negative
 answer, confirming general reluctance to use ‘rebus sic stantibus’ 
doctrine. However some remarks in the ruling seem to leave a door open 
to use this clause as a ground for contract modification…
 
